From the earliest days of the Opt Out movement, the TEA has carved out a dichotomy between Opt Out and parental refusal that has confounded and frustrated parents and, indirectly, led to increased conflict between parents and schools. However, as time has passed, the TEA’s outlook has become increasingly more realistic and focused on de-escalating conflict while still insisting upon participation. For years, we have argued against the scoring of refused assessments. One reason for this is that the practice of scoring refused assessments led to bizarre behavior by schools. While some schools adopted parent friendly approaches like permitting the child to refuse assessment with the parent present, other schools insisted that a child refusing the assessment must be placed in a room, read all the instructions, instructed to begin work, and not released until the full time to complete the assessment passed. Still other schools felt it was fair game to try to trick the students into taking the assessment, leading to predictable ploys like “Your mother just called” and requiring parents to implement password systems to thwart these childish games.
For several years, we have pushed back against those who lay all the blame for bad STAAR behavior on the TEA and pointed out that districts have broad authority to work with parents. In fact, most of the “bad behaviors” we experience due to STAAR are the result of local decisions. When the TEA has acted reasonably, we have applauded them and put the responsibility for bad conduct where it truly belongs. Today is another one of those days. Following several reports of students who stayed off campus for an entire assessment window being scored as having refused, we began to hear rumors that the TEA had told schools that if the parents indicated a refusal, the schools could submit the blank assessment for scoring, even if the student never set foot on campus.
This was a tidal shift, because for years the party line of the school has been “If the student is on campus, we must put the assessment in front of them and tell them to take it.” No more. In response to a recent Public Information Request, TPERN has received documents that confirm that “If the student/parent has refused to test during a particular testing window, the district . . . is not required to put the student in front of the test or a make-up test.” The district need only maintain local documentation of the refusal. This gives the Opt Out letter new importance. Under the guidance of the TEA, the letter now constitutes sufficient evidence to permit the school to submit a blank assessment. The student does not need to be absent for an entire administration window, or even for a single day. And explicitly, the school is not required to put the assessment in front of the student for refusal. As it should be, the word of the parent is sufficient.
Notably, this response was made directly to a district that was asking if it was permissible to not pull a student for makeup testing if they were absent on the assessment day and had a parent note of refusal. Julie Cole made clear, that even if they are there on the assessment day, the school does not have to put the student in front of a test. Similar guidance was given to ESC 14 when a school sought approval of instructions to parents that they must stay home the entire assessment window or take a makeup.
These communications should put to rest any school claims that they are “required” to present the assessment to the student. They aren’t. They never have been. This common sense approach permits schools and parents to work together. It de-escalates needless conflict and permits the viewpoints of both sides to be heard. We applaud the TEA for clarifying this matter once and for all.
For our parents, we suggest:
(1) Use the new opt out letter which contains the refusal language;
(2) Verify with the school that your child will not be presented with the assessment. Use these emails if needed.(Full Copy Lozano Email; Full Copy Wilson Email)
(3) We still suggest being willing to keep the student home for the main assessment days, as the schools are unlikely to be able to accommodate them with any normal learning activities.
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
This test should be eliminated My son had such bad learning problems and the 504 plan didn’t help either! He cried and cried over these test! It stressed him out so bad he wanted to move out of state!!!! REMOVE THESE TEST! ITS STUPID! Why put a kid through this mess?????
I asked about opting out and this was what was received from the teacher.
———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————–
There is no opt out and it is a graduation requirement. Below is from the state.
Question: Is there a right to “opt out” of standardized tests in Texas public schools?
No, in fact just the opposite. State law makes it clear that students may not opt out of standardized or any other tests. Texas Education Code section 26.010 states:
Well thousands of parents say otherwise, and if you read the emails from the TEA, they make it clear parents can refuse. So what’s your question?
One could infer that the question is “Is passing of the STAAR test a legal mandatory requirement for high school graduation in Texas?
I don’t know why or how someone would infer that question from this article. But the answer to your question is not necessarily. We have several articles about high school.
What About High School? (updated 2019)
But They Have to Pass STAAR to Graduate
Graduating By Committee – General Ed Students
Ignorance or Deliberate Lies? Schools and Sub Assessments
what is wrong with STAAR? I am curious what is the benefit of not taking the STAAR?
I’m not interested in convincing you of anything. But if you want to understand some of the reasons people opt out, start here “What Are You Teaching Your Kids?” Then google Montessori Dad We Will not Perpetuate injustice
Does this apply for HS EOC/STAAR tests as well? The HS is telling her she has to sit at the test and answer questions or they cannot accept a substitute assessment.
The school is wrong. Ignorance or Deliberate Lies? Schools and Sub Assessments
If she is going to graduate by IGC she needs to “attempt” the EOCs that she does not pass/substitute. But once she turns in the proof of the sub assessments, the school should record that she has met her graduation requirements.
My sons school says they have to mark a STARR “S” if he doesn’t take it, is that so? Also, is there a TEA document that says otherwise? Thanks for your time and efforts!
Yes. The TEA requires them to do that. We don’t care.
What does marking “S” mean on STARR test?
It means a blank score sheet will be submitted (if you are talking about a kid who is opting out).
Is there a link for these allowances on the government website?
These emails were obtained via the Public Information Act. Feel free to send your own if you think somehow we are not telling you the truth. You certainly can find the refusal procedures in the DCCM manual which is published.
“While state law provides families with the right to temporarily remove their child from a class or school activity if they have an objection to participation, the law does not allow families the right to specifically exclude a child from testing,” a representative with the TEA said in an emailed statement to the Houston Chronicle.
From the TEA about a month ago just a few weeks after the publication of this article. If you’d like the full source: https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/houston-texas/education/article/staar-test-what-to-know-7-things-17058288.php#:~:text=Next%20year's%20STAAR%20test%20will,testing%20will%20move%20entirely%20online.
Has nothing to do with refusal, but thanks for playing. TEA has never admitted opt out exists, but has always admitted refusal does. It’s semantics. The TEA guidance still holds and still specifically instructs schools how to handle refusals.
Hundreds if not thousands of parents had successful refusals following the exact procedures you would like people to believe don’t exist based on a news article and not source documents.
I totally agree that this test should be eliminated or at least the option of opting out but the admin’s replies on here are very rude when people are just trying to find out information and I think that’s the kind of thing that causes the disconnect between parents and schools.
That’s a complete non-sequitur. Regardless, you are welcome to get your opt out information elsewhere. Have a nice day.
I received a call from my child’s school stating that if they do not take the assessments they will have to do accelerated hours next school year which add to 90 hours according to house bill house 4545 ?
HB 4545 Isn’t So Bad
Review our articles and forms on HB 4545
My son has taken English II 4 times already and can not pass. He did summer school and missed out on family events. He is stressed and has quit trying.
What can I do? He will be a senior this year….
Read these articles
But They Have to Pass STAAR to Graduate
Graduating By Committee – General Ed Students
What About High School? (updated 2019)
My son has ADHD plus a learning disability. I was told that my child will fail if he doesn’t pass the test this year. I need a sample of the refusal letter.
Thanks
STAAR is not a promotion requirement in any grade. Letters are contained in the downloads/forms/resources section of this site.
Why is the admin so freaking rude!? U must have passed these test with flying colors right!?
Do you have a question or did you just
Come here to virtue signal?
So, I am reviewing all the rules, laws and TEA babble but can not find anything regarding a student who has successfully past the previous STAAR test being required to participate in accelerated instruction based on a teachers determination of likelihood to fail the current years exam. 7th grade parent here.
That’s because there is absolutely no such requirement. That is made up trash. What district are you dealing with? If you have something in writing send it to txedrights@gmail.com. Also, read this article: TPERN Demands Lake Dallas ISD Stop Threatening Parents
Also, thank you very much for the info. I’m sorry people feel attacked and therefore call you rude for simply being straight forward. And yes, I meant, preciously passed*